Shanghai Consensus on the Role of Cities in International
Relations
3rd International Forum on Public Diplomacy
Oct. 31st – Nov. 1st, Shanghai.
Charhar Institute
(China)
Institut für Auslandsbeziehungen and Robert Bosch
Stiftung
(Germany)
Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’
(Netherlands)
1. Diplomacy
City diplomacy as
the officially recognized activity of local actors in international relations,
parallel to state-based diplomacy, underscores the importance of representational
diversity and diplomatic actors’ proximity to society. It signals how real,
concrete deliverables enhance diplomatic actors’ output legitimacy. City
diplomacy embodies the requirement of governmental reconnection with their
citizens, as for instance expressed by local attention for transnational issues
and global public goods. City diplomacy is dynamic; it puts a premium on
collaborative frameworks and is driven by a variable mix of both top-down and
bottom-up dynamics.
2. Agency
Engaging in city
diplomacy, local governments and local leaders acquire international agency.
Within the framework of the society of states and working in parallel to policy
agendas set at the level of national government, cities can influence the
agenda of the UN system and impact on global governance outcomes.
3. Rescaling
The contributions
to international relations by cities help shape a world that borrows from
experiences before the rise of the society of states, and in which substate actors
do not only become more important in their own right, but are also essential to
meet objectives of state-based diplomacy and global challenges. As actors,
cities are the highly dynamic interface between the global and the local.
4. ‘Cityzenship’
Cities and their
leaders are today serving constituencies that go far beyond national
identities: cities are hubs of communities of common destiny and hinges of
global flows of people, ideas and commerce. It is in the city that most people encounter
governance, partake in community and confront global challenges. The idea of a
city-based citizenship (‘cityzenship') implies ascribing to urban dwellers duties,
but also rights, to the city. Cityzenship might be the most accurate way to convey
the relation between urban dwellers, the international system and global dynamics,
while not necessarily denying states and other formations.
5. Creativity
Cities are most
productive places for the development of innovative processes. Their creative
potential arises from the productive tensions appearing where different social,
cultural, economic and political stakeholders gather. As an international
endeavor, public diplomacy can be inspired by how cities have been such creative
interfaces. City diplomacy has to foster and reinforce this creativity by
establishing, promoting and nurturing innovative and transcultural spaces for discussions,
and platforms for public exchange.
6. Diversity
All cities have
their own character, shaped by history, people and landscapes. The cultural
variety of cities and the international relations they build add to the cultural
richness of a country and provide an opportunity to demonstrate a diverse image
of a country.
7. Continuity
Cities are one of
the most common markers of civilisation throughout the whole history of
humankind, and their external relations have persisted throughout the ages.
City diplomacy has historical roots that date back millennia: cities have for centuries
carried out diplomatic activities with each other and with foreign entities, and
this historical continuity of city diplomacy should be acknowledged to stress the
global, long-lived and well-established influence of cities on human
trajectories. Continuity is one of the most pervasive characteristics of city
diplomacy.
8. Peacebuilding
Cities can play
vital roles in international peace building when state-tostate relations are
caught in a stalemate. Mayors and local politicians can serve as mutually
acceptable intermediaries between national governments. Cities can host
dialogues, symposiums, workshops or cultural events to facilitate mutual understanding
and alleviate a sense of animosity among opinion leaders and the general
public. They can also successfully take the lead in advancing collaboration with
foreign counterparts to promote the global common good. Traditional initiatives
such as 'sister cities' and cities performing as 'cultural capitals' can be upgraded
and invigorated for these purposes.
9. Global public goods
In the
interconnected world of the 21st century, challenged posed to global public
goods (GPGs) have immediate and intensified effects at the local level. In cities
and other local communities people experience these effects, learn through them
and know how to innovate and implement action for the provision of GPGs. The
adaption to specific local conditions makes such efforts therefore more
efficient and sustainable. Cities can share their best practices worldwide and
successfully take the lead in advancing collaboration in the interests of GPGs,
for instance in the fields of environmental protection.
10. Identity
A major factor
behind the unique characteristics of European cities, despite previous planning
errors, is the still visibly human scale of city planning as much as it
reflects a sense of historical obligation. Their citizens live and challenge existing
urban identities as much as they are shaping and confirming them within a framework
that provides the necessary conditions for an active citizenship.