原题为:AIIB can play useful role in reconstruction of earthquake-hit Nepal
原载于:环球时报英文版,5月11日
"While talking about the Belt and Road
Initiative, we should emphasize that the initiative is not solely of China, but
also of the related countries, serving the common development of this
region," Wang Yiwei said introducing his book "Belt and Road
Initiative: Opportunities and Challenges" to a group of experts and
journalists at a roundtable meeting co-hosted by the Charhar Institute and
People’s Publishing House on May 10.
Wang Yiwei, director of the Institute of
International Affairs at Renmin University of China
The Belt and Road Initiative, or the
initiative of jointly building the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-Century
Maritime Silk Road, has been under intense discussions at home and abroad ever
since it was first proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping when he visited
Central Asia and Southeast Asia in September-October 2013.
Wang, director of the Institute of
International Affairs at Renmin University of China, said that some discussions
were misleading as the initiative was sometimes misinterpreted as a Chinese version
of the Marshall Plan and China’s efforts in this regard were viewed as intended
to influence the Asia-Pacific region.
Under these circumstances, the first book
on the Belt and Road Initiative comes off the press to clear up such
misunderstandings.
The Chinese scholar states in his book that
the initiative brings along with it four opportunities: the all-round opening
up of China, improvement of diplomatic ties among neighbors, closer regional
cooperation and common development for the whole world.
“The Belt and Road Initiative is an international proposal as well as
a public product,” Wang said at the meeting. “It is not a repetition of the
ancient tributary system. On the contrary, it is a product of a new century
which needs innovative thinking and cooperation. It aims at development for
all.”
Wang also admits that implementation will
be confronted with challenges including geopolitical factors, security threats,
economic interactions and legal systems. However, he believes that the
initiative conforms to the trend of inclusive globalization and that goal is
achievable.
Other experts at the meeting also shared
their views. Lu Xiankun, a researcher at China Institute for WTO Studies at
University of International Business and Economics, said the Belt and Road
Initiative was raised in a timely manner, providing a large platform for
China’s development, but if China did not send out clearer messages about its
policies, misunderstandings would arise.
Zhang Xiao, associate researcher with
National Development and Reform Commission said that like the Chinese saying
goes, “Long distance separates no bosom friends,” the Belt and Road will
connect us and achieve win-win progress.
Ke Yinbin, secretary general of the Charhar
Institute, said the Belt and Road Initiative is a creative endeavor for “common
modernization” meaning the concerted efforts of all countries and peoples along
the Belt and Road in seeking common interests. He also called for think tanks,
college professors and reporters to retain composure in heated discussions of
the Belt and Road’s due role in contributing to the implementation of the
initiative.